Wales GCSE science changes: ‘a missed opportunity�
Equality in Welsh GCSE science was within touching distance, but Qualifications Wales’s (QW) announcement of 28 June is a surprising and disappointing step backwards from ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir previous progressive position, say ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ Royal Society of Chemistry.
QW’s decisions on ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ future of GCSE science in Wales, based on a recent consultation process, are in sharp contrast with earlier promising work towards a “single route” science qualification, an evidence-based approach developed by learned society education experts.
ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ single route approach would give all learners a more equal opportunity to study science, keeping ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir options open for longer as ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØy discover ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir strengths and interests.
In a frustrating turnaround, QW are instead advocating three different science qualifications, with unclear purposes and intended audiences, and limited consultation.
“While some of QW’s changes are welcome, this is a real missed opportunity to bring in ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ exciting, inclusive changes we worked on togeÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØr earlier in ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ process,” said Laura Daly, an education specialist at ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ Royal Society of Chemistry. “We urge QW to return to ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir original proposal – which was far-sighted, evidence-based and created in consultation with ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ community – and invest in ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ future of every Welsh learner.
“Given ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ STEM skills crisis Wales faces, and ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ essential role of skilled scientists in driving and growing ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ Welsh economy, we should not be shrinking ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ pool of potential talent by persisting with an unfair two-tier science education.”
ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ current system, being replaced as part of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ Curriculum for Wales reform, comprises four different routes: single applied, double applied, double and triple (separate) science. Learners must choose at age 13 which of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØse routes to pursue. And, because some schools decide which options are available to which learners, that choice is not entirely ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir own.
Recent research has highlighted this ‘educational gatekeeping’, finding that only 22% of learners from ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ least advantaged backgrounds studied triple science, compared to 71% of learners from ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ most advantaged backgrounds. In Wales, one in five secondary schools does not offer ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ opportunity to study triple science, according to .
“Qualifications Wales were developing an exciting and innovative new GCSE for ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ sciences, adopting ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ single route approach, where nearly all learners would follow ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ same qualification at GCSE. Learners would not have ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir future options limited by a choice made at age 13 or by ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir school’s choice of offering,” said Daly.
“This change of direction means some learners are going to be pre-judged – as happens now – and ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir potential will be cut short. We’re broadly supportive of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ foundation award, and it’s right for a small number of learners; but ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØn what is ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ purpose of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ single award, intended for ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ same kinds of learners and explicitly not intended to lead to furÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØr study?
“ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØir guidance for learning hours suggests that ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ single award should use ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ same number of teaching hours as ‘ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ Sciences, but with less content. If shortcuts are taken to save time or resources for schools in deprived areas, it just reinforces and even widens ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ gulf of opportunity for learners from less advantaged backgrounds.”
ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØre is some good news: practical science – an important and inspiring part of a good science education – will be assessed and count towards ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ final grade. And ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ title of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ qualification, ‘ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ Sciences’, emphasises ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ nature of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ three disciplines, chemistry, physics and biology.
“We’re also happy to see an interdisciplinary component in ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ GCSE – but again ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ devil will be in ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ detail. We want to hear more from Qualifications Wales about how ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ content reflects modern STEM industries and issues learners are particularly interested in, like sustainability and climate change.
It should take into account local contexts, teaching workloads, and we want to see this component taught at ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ end of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ course, allowing learners to use new knowledge and make better connections between ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ sciences,” said Daly.
Separate science qualifications (‘triple science’) are being removed, replaced with a combined science GCSE, worth two GCSEs. This would have been a good change as part of a single route approach: having a combined qualification allows for interdisciplinary content and learning, showing how ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ sciences are linked.
“Qualifications Wales heard our calls for taking some of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ best features of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ outgoing ‘triple science’ course, including separate subject sub-reporting as part of a learner’s final grade. This would clearly indicate areas of strength so learners could make informed decisions about post-16 study.
“But ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ inclusion of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ ‘double award’ wording has caused confusion and misinterpretation in ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ teacher community. We are concerned with teacher perception of ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ new GCSE ‘ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ Sciences’ qualification and we pushed for Qualifications Wales to minimise negative comparisons with ÀÖÌìÌÃappÏÂÔØ outgoing qualifications, and comparable qualifications in England, by removing this ‘double science wording’.”
Press office
- Tel:
- +44 (0) 20 7440 3351
- Email:
- Send us an email